Major Pending Cases
- See All Pending Cases
- See All Archived Cases
- AAPD v. Herrara
- ACORN v. Murphy
- ACORN v. Scott
- Coleman v. Franken
- Common Cause v. Coffman
- Daien v. Ysursa
- DiMaio v. Democratic National Committee
- Farrakhan v. Locke
- Florida State Conference of the NAACP v. Browning
- Gonzalez v. Arizona; Navajo Nation v. Brewer; Purcell v. Gonzalez
- Janis v. Nelson
- King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association v. Blackwell
- League of Women Voters v. Rokita
- LULAC of Texas v. State of Texas
- McCain-Palin 2008 v. Cunningham
- Minnesota Majority v. Ritchie
- Morales v. Handel
- NAACP v. Billups
- NAACP-SCP v. Cortes
- Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Gonzales
- Ohio ex rel. Colvin v. Brunner
- Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections v. Browning
- Texas Democratic Party v. Bettencourt
- Texas Democratic Party v. Dallas County
- United States of America v. Brown
- United States v. New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense
- USSAF v. Land
- Valdez v. Herrera
- White v. Reed
- Young v. Hosemann
Election Law Litigation
Valdez v. Herrera
(page last updated November 20, 2009 at 10:39 AM)
Case Information
Current Court: U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico (Case 1:09-cv-00668-LAM-DJS )
All Courts: U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico (Case 1:09-cv-00668-LAM-DJS )
Topic(s): Voter Registration
State: New Mexico
Date Filed: July 9, 2009
Issue:
Whether a New Mexico statute, requiring voter registration to be offered when an individual renews a drivers license or state-issued identification card, has been violated.
Status:
Complaint filed 7/9.
Federal District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 7/9/09) - Answer of Defendant Mary Herrera (filed 8/3/09)
- Answer by Defendants HSD and TRD (filed 8/3/09)
- Initial Scheduling Order (filed 8/21/09)
- Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan (filed 9/8/09)
- Minute Order Reassigning Case to Senior U.S. District Judge C. Leroy Hansen (entered 9/9/09)
- Scheduling Order (filed 9/21/09)
- Notice of Hearing (entered 9/28/09)
- Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (filed 10/2/09)
- Exhibit A - Amended Complaint (filed 10/2/09)
- Exhibit A - Amended Complaint
- Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint (filed 10/2/09)
- Response to Motion for Leave to filed Amended Complaint (filed 10/16/09)
- Reply in Support of Motion to filed Amended Complaint (filed 11/2/09)
Related EL@M Articles
Election Law @ Moritz | Professor Edward B. Foley, Director | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation, but individuals affiliated with the program may from time to time in their own personal capacity engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.
The Ohio State University | Michael E. Moritz College of Law | 55 West 12th Avenue | Columbus, OH 43210-1391 | (614) 292-2631
If you have trouble accessing this page or need to request an alternate format, please email the Moritz Law Webmaster
PDF files in this site may require Adobe Reader to view (link opens in new window)