OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

McCutcheon v. FEC

Case Information

Date Filed: June 22, 2012
State: Washington, D.C.
Issue: Campaign Finance
Courts that Heard this Case: United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Case 1:12-cv-01034-JEB-JRB-RLW); United States Supreme Court (Case 12-536)

Issue:

Whether the aggregate federal donation limits for each election cycle violate the 1st amendment.

Status:

Complaint filed 6/22/12. Memorandum Opinion issued 9/28/12. Notice of Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court filed 10/9/12. FEC's Motion to Dismiss or Affirm filed 1/2/13. Appellants' Brief Opposing Motion to Dismiss or Affirm filed 1/14/13. Brief of Republican National Committee filed 5/6/13. Brief of Appellant Shaun McCutcheon filed 5/6/13. Argued 10/8/13. Reversed and remanded on 4/2/14.Final Judgment filed 8/15/14.

 

Supreme Court Documents

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral Fix We Really Need

Edward B. Foley

The Electoral College winner should be the majority choice in each state that counts towards that Electoral College victory.

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Trump: Mike Pence to lead voter fraud probe

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in The Christian Science Monitor in an article about the investigation into voter fraud that will be led by Vice President Mike Pence. More than a dozen lawsuits nationwide regarding voting rights and access await federal court.

“Voting litigation is increasing, not decreasing,” Foley said. “The main impression … is that when a law looks like it’s engaging in outright disenfranchisement of a valid voter, even conservative judges have been stopping that. [But] the judiciary is more tolerant with state legislatures adjusting issues of convenience and accessibility, if the adjustment is not outright disenfranchisement.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

U.S. District Judge Rules that Ohio Voter Services Website Violates ADA

A U.S. District Judge issued an opinion finding that the Ohio Secretary of State\'s voter services website violates Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act because it is not accessible to visually impaired Ohio voters. Judge George C. Smith ordered Secretary of State John Husted to make the site more accessible by September 29, 2017. As discussed in the opinion, the information on the voter services site does not meet established standards of accessibility for visually impaired voters who use screen reading software. The case is Hindel v. Husted.

more info & analysis...