Last Updated: December 23, 2011 at 12:21 PM
Zirkle v. Henry
Case Information
Date Filed: June 20, 2011
State: New Jersey
Issue: Voting Technology
Current Court: Superior Court of New Jersey (Case L-000567-11 )
Issue:
Whether certain touch-screen voting machines are unconstitutional because voters cannot be assured their vote is counted as cast or recorded.
Status:
Petition filed 6/20/11.
Superior Court Documents
- Petition (filed 6/20/11)
- Show Cause Hearing Transcript
(filed 9/1/11)
Related News
- Fairfield candidates contest election results, blaming touch-screen machines (6-20-11)
- "Human error" found in Fairfield election results (7-7-11)
- Judge wants expert witness, voting machine docs in Fairfield case (7-11-11)
- Computer files deleted in Fairfield election case (8-31-11)
- Electronic voting case prompts new election, investigation in Fairfield (9-1-11)




Commentary
Provisional Ballots, Consent Decrees, and the Balance Between the Federal and State Governments
Owen Wolfe
A recent mandamus action filed by the Ohio Senate President and House Speaker Pro Tempore to require the Ohio Secretary of State to rescind directives issued in response to a consent decree issued in a federal case dealing with counting provisional ballots raises questions about the mechanics of state election law, the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the relationship between federal and state courts, the law of consent decrees, and more. I have attempted in this article to grapple with these issues in a fair and unbiased manner. Given the complexity of this problem, however, these matters are open to a variety of interpretations and this is just one approach. I hope, however, that this article can provide a useful starting point for a discussion about the future of provisional voting in Ohio and in the nation at large.
This paper is a first look by a student member of the Election Law @ Moritz team and reflects one possible perspective on the issue. Stay tuned, as more analysis from the team will follow as the litigation develops. Owen Wolfe is affiliated with the Ohio Democratic Party and the Obama ’12 campaign, but is not in any way associated with any litigation team working on this case. EL@M has posted the document because we believe it has public value and adds to the discourse on this topic.
more commentary...