OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

.

.

Wagner v. Federal Election Commission

Case Information

Date Filed: October 19, 2011
State: Washington, D.C.
Issue: Campaign Finance
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Case 1:11-cv-01841); U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (Case 13-5162)

Issue:

Whether a federal statute barring individuals who have government contracts from making political contributions is constitutional.

Status:

Complaint filed 10/19/2011. Answer filed 2/17/12. Motion for Preliminary Injunction denied 4/16/12. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed 7/12/12. FEC's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 8/15/12. Memorandum and opinion issued 11/2/12. Notice of appeal filed 11/8/12. Circuit Court scheduling order filed 11/19/12. Appellant Brief filed 1/16/13. Appellee Brief filed 2/20/13. Oral Argument held 5/16/13. Opinion Per Curiam Vacating and Remanding 5/31/13. Order Holding Case in Abeyance pending McCutcheon v. FEC filed 9/11/13. Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief filed 4/25/14. Per Curiam Opinion filed 7/7/15.

Circuit Court Documents

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

When Should a Voter’s “Clerical Error” Invalidate a Ballot?

Edward B. Foley

Not when the state already has enough information to verify the ballot’s validity.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Michigan Federal Judge Blocks Law Prohibiting Straight Ticket Voting

U.S. District Judge Gershwin Drain issued an opinion blocking enforcement of a Michigan law prohibiting straight-ticket voting. This voting method allows voters to easily select the entire slate of candidates on the ballot from a particular party. Michigan abolished straight-ticket voting by enacting a law effective in January. In granting the plaintffs\' motion for a preliminary injunction, Judge Drain determined that the law \"presents a disproportionate burden on African-Americans\' right to vote.\" The case is Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Johnson.

more info & analysis...