OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

NAACP New York State Conference v. New York State Board of Elections

Case Information

Date Filed: June 28, 2010
State: New York
Issues: Voting Rights Act, Voting Technology
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Case 1:10-cv-02950)

Issue:

Whether New York's overvote practice and procedure results or will result in the denial of New York citizen's right to vote on account of race or color, in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Status:

Amended Complaint filed 9/2/10. Answers by all Defendants filed on 10/1/10.  Motion to Compel filed 11/17/10. Parties' Stipulation and Joint Motion for Confidentiality filed 8/4/11. Motion to Dismiss filed 2/29/12. Case dismissed 8/8/12.

District Court Documents

Commentary

Justin   Levitt

Arizona: Voter Registration and the Road Ahead

Justin Levitt

 

June arrived with two election law cases at the Supreme Court. One is still pending: a highly anticipated decision on section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The other, more frequently overlooked, was decided yesterday. And there are some quirks of the opinion that seem to depart from the swiftly congealing conventional wisdom that the states might actually have "won," and now need only run out the clock.

more commentary...

In the News

Michelle  Alexander

Johnson: Disenfranchising felons hits minorities hardest

Professor Michelle Alexander was quoted in an Athens Banner-Herald article from her book "The New Jim Crow." The article focuses on the disenfranchisement of felons in states like Virginia, where more than seven percent of the adult population cannot vote due to felony charges. In Virginia, Gov. Robert McDonnell is taking steps to restore the right to vote to nonviolent felons.

Alexander's book calls on the idea that disenfranchising felons affects minorities most. She calls voting-rights restoration processes a “bureaucratic maze” that is “cumbersome, confusing and onerous.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court: NVRA Pre-empts Arizona's Proof of Citizenship Law

In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the NVRA preempts an Arizona law requiring documentation of citizenship to accompany voter registration forms. The case is Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.

more info & analysis...