OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz



Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted

Case Information

Date Filed: September 25, 2013
State: Ohio
Issue: Ballot Access
Current Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Case 14-03030)


Issue 1:

Does Secretary Husted's enforcement of residency requirements for circulators of candidates' nominating petitions  violate the First Amendment?

Issue 2:

Does Secretary Husted's enforcement of residency requirements for circulators of candidates' nominating petitions, as applied,  violate the First Amendment?


Complaint file 9/25/13. Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 9/26/13. Motion for Intervention by State of Ohio filed 10/3/13. Opinion and Order granting preliminary injunction filed 11/14/13. Motion to Intervene by Hart et al filed 11/27/13. Husted's answer filed 11/29/13. Ohio's answer filed 11/29/13. Intervenors' motion for TRO and preliminary injunction filed 12/3/13. Opinion and Order granting preliminary injunction filed 1/7/14. Husted Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed 1/9/14. Ohio Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed 1/9/14. Notice of Appeal from Order Granting Preliminary Injunction filed 1/10/14. Appeal Dismissed on 2/21/14. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed on 3/7/14. Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed 3/7/14. Defendant's Notice of Related Case in Ohio Supreme Court filed 3/11/14. Defendant's Opposition to Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed 3/11/14. Order denying Plaintiffs' Motion for TRO filed on 3/19/14. Plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal as to Order denying Motion for TRO filed 3/19/14. Order denying Motion to Stay filed 3/20/14. Motion for Emergency Injunction and Expedited Appeal filed 3/20/14. Order denying Emergency Injunction and granting Expedited Appeal filed 3/21/14. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed 3/26/14.  Appellant Brief filed 3/30/14. Husted and State of Ohio's Answer to Amended Complaint filed 4/9/14. Libertarian Party's Reply Brief filed 4/13/14.  Oral Argument set for 4/22/14. Opinion and Order Affirming District Court filed 5/1/14. Motion for Stay filed 5/1/14. Order Denying Stay filed 5/1/14. Order denying Stay Request filed 5/1/14. Order denying rebanc hearing filed 6/4/14. Mandate filed 6/12/14. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production from Secretary filed 7/8/14. Order granting Motion to Compel filed 7/11/14. Defendants' Objection to Order filed 7/18/14. Order overruling objection to Magistrate's opinion, granting plaintiff's motion to compel, and denying motion for protective order filed 7/24/14. Order denying Motion to Compel filed 7/31/14.

District Court Documents

Court of Appeals Documents

Court of Appeals Documents (as to denial of TRO)



Daniel P. Tokaji

What's the Matter with Kobach?

Daniel P. Tokaji

By "Kobach," I mean the Kobach v. EAC case in which the Tenth Circuit heard oral argument Monday – rather than its lead plaintiff, Kansas’ controversial Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who argued the position of his state and the State of Arizona. This post discusses what’s at issue in the case, where the district court went wrong, and what the Tenth Circuit should do.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Judge Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in NC Case

U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder denied the motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs in a case challenging a new North Carolina voting law as violating the Voting Rights Act and the federal Constitution. Judge Schroeder also denied the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory.

more info & analysis...