OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Kohls v. Martin

Case Information

Date Filed: April 16, 2014
State: Arkansas
Issue: Voter ID
Courts that Heard this Case: Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas Sixth Division (Case 60CV-14-1495); Supreme Court of Arkansas (Case CV-14-462)

Issue:

Whether state statute requiring voters to provide proof of identity before voting violates the Arkansas constitution.  

Status:

Petition filed 4/16/14. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 4/22/14. Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas filed 4/25/14. Defendants' Response to Motion to Quash filed 4/28/14. Defendant Martin's Answer filed 5/2/14. Defendants' Answer filed 5/9/14. Order on Preliminary Injunction filed 5/23/14. Defendants' Notice of Appeal filed 5/23/14. Appellant's Brief filed 7/3/14. Separate Appellants Brief filed 7/7/14. Appellee's Brief filed 8/11/14. Opinion finding that Voter ID law violates Arkansas Constitution filed 10.15.14.

Supreme Court Documents

Circuit Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

When Should a Voter’s “Clerical Error” Invalidate a Ballot?

Edward B. Foley

Not when the state already has enough information to verify the ballot’s validity.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

An Obscure Ohio State Law Could Shake Up the Republican Convention

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in an ABC News article about the Republican Convention:

“It’s entirely imaginable that these kind of controversies will emerge if Donald Trump goes into Cleveland without 1,237,” said Dan Tokaji, an expert in election law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, referring the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination. “There’s going to be a furious jockeying for these delegates.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

6th Circuit Reverses District Court, Permits Elimination of Golden Week in Ohio

In a 2-1 opinion released today, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the District Court, which had blocked the Ohio General Assembly\'s elimination of a \"Golden Week\" in which voters could both register and cast their votes. The Sixth Circuit disagreed with the District Court\'s determination that Ohio\'s election laws violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. The case is Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted.

more info & analysis...